Initial group research includes following: 

1. Gender theory, gender approach

2. Gender aspects of economy

3. Gender and labour market 

4. Gender and education

5.Gender and healthcarte

6. Gender and environment

7. Gender and transportation

8. Gender and power sector

9. Gender and trade

10. Gender and agriculture

Gender profile of the Republic of Uzbekistan

         According to the World Bank definition Uzbekistan is a lower middle income country with GNI per capita as of US$1,900 in 2013[1]. Total number of population of Uzbekistan is 30.49 million people (2014)[2] (Table2). Women constitute around half of population. Economic growth remained robust at 8.0 percent in 2013, making 2013 the seventh consecutive year of growth at 8.0 percent or better. The main contributors to growth were industry, specifically construction, which expanded by 9.0 percent (up from 8.0 percent in 2012), services at 8.8 percent (down from 10.4 percent), agriculture grew by 6.8 percent (versus 7.0 in 2012), supported by favorable weather and record harvests of the key cereal and vegetable crops.[3] Uzbekistan is one of the countries that experienced socio-economic transformations from centrally planned economy towards establishing market mechanisms of economic development based on the strategy of macroeconomic stability and destructuralization of the productive sectors of economy, which is highly resource-dependent. 

Table 1. Key macroeconomic trends of Uzbekistan in 2009 -2013

Indicators

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

GDP growth rates

8.1

8.5

8.3

8.2

8.2

Capital investments

25.0

9.0

7.9

11.6

10.0

The industry sector’s  growth rates

9.9

4.4

4.5

7.7

8.4

The share of the industry sector in the GDP

33.6

33.4

32.6

32.4

24.3

The agricultural sector growth rates

5.8

6.6

6.6

7.0

6.0

The share of the agricultural sector in the GDP

20.6

18.8

19.1

18.9

16.6

The services sector’s growth rates

6.8

11.2

12.0

10.4

8.8

The share of services in the GDP

45.8

46.8

48.3

48.7

52.0

Source: State Department of Statistics; ADB. Asian Development Outlook 2014; The World Bank data.

[1] http://data.worldbank.org/country/uzbekistan

[2] State statistics committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. http://www.stat.uz/press/1/8195/

[3] Asian Development Bank.  Asian Development Outlook 2014.  Fiscal Policy for Inclusive Growth.

Economic and human development indicators

              In accordance with the assessments of the World Bank, the poverty line in Uzbekistan accounted for 27.5 percent of population in 2001, including 30.5 percent in rural areas and 22.5 in urban. In 2011 the indicator declined to 16.0 percent [1] as the economy gradually revived.In 2012, Uzbekistan had a Human Development Index (HDI) score of 0.654, positioning it at the 114th place out of a total of 186 countries. Human development indicators for Uzbekistan are characterized by uneven performance. The state of gender equality in Uzbekistan has remained static for the last decade. Life expectancy at birth in 2012 was 68.27 (in 2002 life expectancy at birth was 70.3), adult literacy rate in 2012 was 99.48 (in 2002 adult literacy rate was 99.3), GDP per capita in 2012 was at $1,720 (in 2002 GDP per capita was $1,620). The Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI)[2] for Uzbekistan in 2014 was 0.1475. Uzbekistan’s Gender -Related Development Index rank in 2009 was 99 out of 155 countries. Since 2010 UNDP replaced GDI and GEM by the Gender Inequality Index (GII), which is based on three dimensions: reproductive health, employment and the labour market. Gender Inequality Index has not been calculated for Uzbekistan because data has been unavailable. ( Table 2).

Table 2.  Human Development and Gender ranking for Uzbekistan.

Indicator

Value/Category/Rank

Human Development Index

HDI=1/3 (life expectancy index) +1/3 (education index) +1/3 (GDP)

0.654

114/186 (2014)

Social Institutions and Gender Index

SIGI focuses on discriminatory social institutions

0.1475 (2014)

Medium/108

Gender Inequality Index

GII ranks countries by reproductive health, employment and the labour market

-

Gender Equality Index

GEI  ranks 168 countries by measuring women’s relative economic activity, education and empowerment

0.5913

106/168

Women’s Economic Opportunity Index

Scoring model summarizing 26 indicators: Labour policy and practice, Access to finance, Education and training, Women’s legal and social status, General business environment.

97/128

Global Gender Gap Index

Assesses division of resources and opportunities among male and female populations, regardless of the overall levels of these resources and opportunities

-          /68

UNDP does not provide a gender inequality score for Uzbekistan for 2011, and Uzbekistan is not ranked in the 2011 Global Gender Gap Index. 

 

[1] http://data.worldbank.org/country/uzbekistan

[2] The SIGI capture information about “discriminatory social institutions, such as early marriage, discriminatory inheritance practice, violence against women, son preference, restricted access to public space and restricted access to land and credit.”[2]  SIGI comprises 21 innovative variables of discriminatory social institutions, which are grouped into 5 sub-indices: discriminatory family code, restricted physical integrity, son bias, restricted resources and assets, and restricted civil libertie

Economic Growth and Poverty

Official estimates show that poverty declined from 25.8 percent of the population in 2005 to reportedly 14.1 percent in 2013 (Table 7). This decline is a result of rapid economic growth, sustained annual increases in salaries, incomes from micro and small businesses, and the Government’s targeted social support programs. Besides, net remittances from labor migrants have helped many families in Uzbekistan not to fall below poverty line.  

Table 3.  The Impact of Economic Growth on Poverty rate

 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

GDP per capita as % against previous year

118.5

106.1

108.0

106.7

107.0

107.3

108.3

108.4

106.3

Total poverty rate

25.8

24.7

23.3

22.2

21.1

20.0

16.0

15.0

14.1

Source: State committee of statistics of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Welfare Improvement Strategy 2012-2015.

During 2002-13 per capita GDP grew by 1.97 times and poverty significantly declined by 48.7 percent.  Despite the low sensitivity of poverty reduction to GDP growth the level of inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient has changed. According to Uzbekistan official statistics the Gini coefficient declined from 0.45 in 2006 to 0.3 in 2012.[1] 

Table 4.  Urban Rural Poverty Trends[2]

 

2000-01

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Total poverty

31.5

26.5

27.2

26.1

25.8

24.9

23.6

Urban Poverty

27.8

21.8

22.0

18.8

18.3

17.9

17.6

Rural Poverty

33.6

29.4

28.7

30.3

30.0

28.8

27.1

The poverty rate in rural areas in 2000-01 was 33.6 percent compared to 27.8 in urban areas; 27.1 in rural and 17.6 in urban areas in 2007. Between 2000-01 and 2004, urban poverty decreased dramatically by over 32 percent. But progress slowed drastically between 2004 and 2007: the decline was a little over 6 percent. 

Gender analysis of agriculture  

The process of transformation and creation of the market mechanisms of economic development is based on the strategy that covers macroeconomic stability, institutional market and restructuring of production sectors of the economy.   The main objective is to create favorable economic conditions for development of an individual and small business and to provide support to vulnerable levels of the population. On the assumption of assigned tasks, a special attention was given to development of women’s entrepreneurship in rural areas and women’s attraction to farming activities. Though, the level of women’s participation in development of farmers’ movement is not sufficient yet and requires relevant studying and developing certain measures to increase a number of female farmers that lets essentially to effect on the growth of living standard of the population in rural areas. Women make up 48.2 percent of total number of able-bodied population employed in agriculture. From the beginning of reforms it is being observed the process of decline in women’s employment in rural areas, in view of decreasing the opportunities for job placement in formal sector.  Rural women face the certain difficulties in the course of competition on a labor market, as far as the process of reforming the agriculture sector brought inevitably to change of employment structure in rural area. Besides, the wide range of rural women’s duties in household does not allow them to be active on the labour market and forces to give up looking for a job. Women are mostly responsible for non-paid household work, and besides care of children, elderly, sick, or disabled family members, they work on the family plots, or dehkan farm, at the kitchen garden, involved in livestock rearing, and etc. According to findings of the household survey, conducted in rural areas in three regions of Uzbekistan, it is mostly wives (73 percent), daughters or daughters in law (63 percent) who are responsible for unpaid household work. Husbands, sons or sons-in-law are responsible for unpaid household chores only in 2-8 percent of the households.[1] Rural Women express their will to start business activities; however, they feel lack of entrepreneurial skills, they afraid of blindness, regarding laws and regulations, lack of mobility, and time poverty. The entrepreneurial activities of rural women mostly focused on micro and small-scale enterprises, cross border trade, subcontracting work at home or street trading. The integration of rural women into the formal sector is constrained by limited access to credit and property. Women are less competitive on the labor market. Consenting to any job, women are busy with nonqualified work, not requiring high level of training. But from the other side, women are mostly engaged in seasonal kinds of agricultural works, and that accordingly provides for seasonal payments. It is essentially to note that in the process of reforming agricultural sector a tendency to the growth of remuneration in the sector emerged. 

 Women’s role in agriculture, gender aspects of farmer’s movement

The process of reorganizing shirkats was happening on the basis of tender where a special attention was given to availability of starting capital and equipment for the persons who wanted to deal with farming, awareness of agricultural production was being examined, and the priorities was being given to former shirkat members, inhabitants of the local area. However, this process was going on definitely not in every region, and not everywhere women could have opportunity for equal participation in tenders, as far as traditionally, they do not dispose of required resources.According to expert appraisals, activization peak of farmers’ movement fell on 2005-2006 and the process of enlarging leasehold farms has been observed: more successful farmers began to acquire lands from less successful farmers by this or another way. During the campaign on leasehold farms enlargement the total number of farms reduced more than 2 times. At present, the total number of farms is 73810 (01.05.2014)[4] compare to 190 thousands in 2008. According to data of Association of dehkan and leasehold farms, 17 000 women were led leasehold farms (or 7.2 percent out of total) in June 2007[5]. After the start of the campaign for enlarging leasehold farms the number of farms led by women reduced to 12084 (5.5 percent out of total) in August 2008[6]. Currently, number of farms led by women is 4444 (6 percent out of total)[7].  These numbers certify that the processes of reforming in rural areas and mechanism of reorganization of shirkat farms to leasehold farms went on with the definite difficulties which did not contribute to the wide women’s attraction.

              The smallest number of farms led by women is in Navoi region of 1.4 per cent, as well as in the Syrdarya and Bukhara regions, 2.7 and 5.1 percent respectively. The largest number of farms led by women is in Khorezm region - 13.1 percent out of total number of farms. 

Table  5.  Distribution of private farms by sex and regions (01.05.2014)

 

Regions

As percent of total

Distribution by sex

 

 

women

men

women

Men

Republic of  Karakalpakstan

3.9

4.6

5.2

94.8

Andijan

11.1

8.8

7.5

92.5

Bukhara

5.1

5.4

5.7

94.3

Jizzakh

10.4

7.8

7.9

92.1

Kashkadarya

8.8

11.1

4.9

95.1

Navoi

1.4

2.4

3.5

96.5

Namangan

10.9

7.0

9.0

91.0

Samarkand

11.9

11.3

6.7

93.3

Sirdarya

2.7

7.5

2.3

97.7

Surkhandarya

5.2

7.1

7.9

92.1

Tashkent

9.2

8.6

6.4

95.6

Ferghana

6.3

12.1

3.2

96.8

Khorezm

13.1

6.3

11.9

88.1

Total

In percentage

100.0

100.0

6.0

94.0

In thousands

4444

69366

 

 

 

 

            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Calculations based on data of the Council of Farmers of Uzbekistan.

Table 6.  Distribution of women-farmers by age and regions (01.05.2014)

Regions

As percent of total

Share of women-farmers at the age of, including:

 

Under 30

30-40

40-50

50- 60

60 and over

Republic of  Karakalpakstan

3.5

5.1

5.2

1.3

0

Andijan

18.0

12.9

9.8

5.6

14.4

Bukhara

5.1

7.0

4.1

4.9

3.2

Jizzakh

24.2

17.7

4.3

3.6

5.4

Kashkadarya

2.3

6.4

10.9

14.1

3.6

Navoi

0.9

1.2

1.9

0.7

1.8

Namangan

17.7

7.7

10.2

14.3

3.6

Samarkand

8.1

14.8

15.4

4.9

4.5

Sirdarya

2.3

2.2

3.4

3.2

0

Surkhandarya

9.0

5.4

4.2

5.6

0

Tashkent

0.5

4.9

10.3

18.9

11.7

Ferghana

1.8

7.1

6.5

4.0

20.7

Khorezm

6.5

7.6

13.8

18.9

31.1

Total

In percentage

100

100

100

100

100

Number, persons

566

1214

1626

816

222

Source: Calculations based on data of the Council of Farmers of Uzbekistan

There is a lack of sustainable mechanisms of interaction of farmers in the regions and the structures aimed to provide all possible assistance and support. Most of women know little or nothing about the best practices of sustainable agriculture management. Women farmers need advisory, information and mentoring services not only to improve their agronomic knowledge, but also they need professional advice in the field of legal knowledge, banking, as well as the basics of doing business.  

 UN Women, USAID, CACAARI, ICARDA and other international organizations are providing training programs for women farmers in different areas of Uzbekistan. UN Women has been working on improvement of women’s access to land and USAID is providing support to ten legal aid centers that offer women-farmers information on their rights through training sessions and workshops. Central Asia and the Caucasus Association of Agriculture al Research Institutions (CACAARI) began implementing the program in 2013, in partnership with the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (MAWR) of Uzbekistan, the Uzbek Scientific Production Center for Agriculture, ICARDA, and the Tashkent State Agrarian University.


[1] Household Survey in three regions of Uzbekistan. “Expert Ficri” Center for social and marketing research. ADB.  Advanced Electricity Metering project. 2011. P.15

[2] “Linking Macroeconomic policy to poverty reduction. Family assets mobilization6 a survey of households in three oblasts of Uzbekistan. Unpublished. Tashkent.CER. 2004.

[3] «Farm income and expenditure survey». Analytical report on the results of the surveys under the  TA 4820 - «Monitoring and Implementation of Policy Reforms in Agriculture Sector ».  ADB/Government of Uzbekistan/Donaev Management Consulting. 2007.

[4] According to the data base of the Council of Farmers of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

[5] D.Alimdjanova.2009, Gender aspects of agricultural and rural employment: application for Uzbekistan. Presentation at the FAO, International Fund for Agriculture Development, and ILO workshop on Gaps, Trends and Current Research in Gender Dimensions of Agricultural and Rural Employment Differential Pathways out of Poverty. Rome. 

[6] D. Alimdjanova. 2009, “The level of entrepreneurship development among rural women of Uzbekistan, and ways of their economic empowerment”.Draft report. Manila: ADB/UNDP/Gender Program of the Swiss Embassy in Uzbekistan.

[7] Author’s calculations. Basic information- The Council of Farmers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 

11. Gender and water management

12. Gender and religion

13. Gender and Mass Media